Done-for-you AI visibility
When buyers ask AI who's best in your market — if it isn't you, that's what we fix.
Your buyers ask AI engines who to trust before they ever reach your site. I built GEO Toolbox — the platform used to measure AI visibility — and my team and I rebuild your pages to get cited in those answers, then prove it monthly with the tracker I built.
20-min intro call · no obligation · founder-led delivery.
- On-time or we refund the milestone
- You own every page & dataset
- Reporting is raw tracker output

The proof, from our own test domain
One fresh, zero-authority domain. The receipts, by source.
These are the numbers, not a promise — the exact figures, stamped, and updated as they move. The Google ranking figures came from about 7 weeks of publishing on a domain that drove near-zero traffic before. The two AI-answer figures are kept apart on purpose: one is Google's own count of our links inside AI Overviews and AI Mode, the other a separate 30-day Bing sample.
- Keywords ranked in Google
- 20,541
- Google Search Console · 28-day window
- On Google's first page (top 10)
- 9,639
- Google Search Console · 28-day window
- Appearances inside Google's AI answers
- 91,400
- Google Search Console · AI Overviews + AI Mode · 28-day window15× in 28 days
- AI-citation appearances in Bing
- ~108,300
- Bing WMT · Microsoft Copilot and partners · 30-day sample30-day sample
- Google impressions per day
- ~20,610
- Google Search Console · 28-day avg
Queries ranked in Google
Search Console API · unique queries / month · *month to date
Queries on Google's first page
Search Console API · avg. position ≤ 10 · *month to date
| Month | Queries ranked | Top 10 | Top 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2026 | 27 | 17 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 3,014 | 576 | 110 |
| Jul 2026 | 8,664 | 3,000 | 444 |
| Aug 2026 (month to date) | 21,117 | 10,361 | 2,858 |
As of 28 Aug 2026. The keyword, first-page, and monthly-chart figures are exact unique-query counts from the Google Search Console API, refreshed automatically every 48 hours (keywords over a trailing 28-day window, chart by calendar month). Impressions per day is a Google-only 28-day average from Search Console.
The 91,400 figure is Google's own — impressions from the Search Console “Generative AI features” report (AI Overviews + AI Mode), trailing 28 days to 28 Aug 2026, up from 5,910 in the previous 28 days. It counts times a geotoolbox.ai link was shown inside an AI answer, not clicks and not unique citations. That report is still in beta and has no API, so it is read by hand.
The ~108,300 AI-citation figure is a 30-day sample from Bing Webmaster Tools' AI Performance report (Microsoft Copilot and partners), as of 28 Aug 2026 — a count of citation appearances, not unique citations, and not attributable to ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google.
What's actually happening
Three symptoms. One cause.
- 01
Your Google Search Console shows impressions climbing and clicks flat or falling.
- 02
A buyer asks ChatGPT “best [your category]” and it names three competitors, by name — not you.
- 03
Your classic SEO report has no column for any of it, because rank trackers can’t see inside an AI answer.
One cause: the answer your buyer reads is being written by an AI engine that doesn't cite you yet. That's the gap we close — and the one we can actually measure.
What you get, and how it runs
Three outcomes. Audit, build, track.
No black box, no list of busywork tasks. Each stage is one outcome you can check, and each one produces an artifact you can hold — a baseline, a rebuilt page, a monthly log — so you always know what the money bought.
- 01Audit
You see exactly where you stand — before we touch anything.
Week one: a cross-engine baseline from our own tracker — which prompts your buyers use, which engines cite you versus your competitors, the gap in numbers. You start from data, not a hunch.
cross-engine baseline
- 02Build
Your pages get rewritten to be quotable — and you own the questions that end in a purchase.
We rebuild your priority pages so an AI engine can lift your answer with your name attached: verifiable claims, clean structure, the sources an engine trusts. The focus is the comparison and “which should I buy” prompts where the shortlist forms, past the “what is [category]” trivia — while your classic Google rankings hold.
priority pages rebuilt
- 03Track
Every month: citations gained, engines, prompts — tracker logs, not sentiment.
Your report is the raw tracker output — which engines, which prompts, the deltas. A log from a measurement tool. If a month is flat, it says flat. Same numbers, both of us.
monthly citation log
The case study is my own site
From a zero-authority domain to page one — and into the AI answers.
I started geotoolbox.ai from nothing — no aged domain, no link package. The first meaningful AI citations arrived in about 7 weeks, and today Google Search Console shows it ranking across thousands of keywords — 9,639 of them on page one over the trailing 28 days (real, unique, verifiable in GSC). And the part a normal SEO can't report: Google's own Generative AI features report counts 91,400 appearances of this site inside AI Overviews and AI Mode in the last 28 days — up from 5,910 the 28 days before — while over a separate trailing 30-day window Bing's AI Performance report logged a large volume of AI-citation appearances across Copilot and partners. Two engines, two reports, both in the receipts.
Why it matters commercially: the prompts we get cited for most aren't trivia — they're buying-intent comparison and shortlist questions (“best tools for Search Generative Experience,” “answer engine optimization vs SEO,” “Copilot vs Gemini”). The moment a buyer decides. That's the real estate we build for clients.
geotoolbox.ai · the receipt
- First AI citations, in about
- 7 wks
- In Google's top 3
- 2,559
- Inside Google's AI answers28-day GSC impressions
- 91,400
- AI-citation appearances30-day Bing sample
- ~108,300
Ranking figures are unique GSC data, as of 28 Aug 2026. The AI-answer figure is impressions from Google's own Search Console “Generative AI features” report (AI Overviews + AI Mode), as of 28 Aug 2026. The AI-citation figure is a separate 30-day sampled appearance count from Bing Webmaster Tools (Microsoft Copilot and partners), as of 28 Aug 2026 — not unique citations, and not ChatGPT, Perplexity or Google data. Neither figure counts clicks; the two are never added together.
Client results, before geotoolbox
One client, two verticals — cited across the AI engines.
Two guides on one client's site, in very different markets — both projects I led before geotoolbox. The client stays unnamed, but the proof is public: AI-engine citation scans (from the tracker I built) and Ahrefs positions, not private analytics. This ran on an earlier version of the system we use now.

Legal-services vertical · client guide
- Cited by 7 of 7 AI engines — the #1 cited source for “how to run google ads for lawyers,” cited ahead of google.com itself.
- Featured in Google’s AI Overview for “google ads for lawyers.” Organic position 5–6 (US).
- On page 1 within weeks of publishing, with no prior topical authority.

Fintech / crypto vertical · client guide
- Cited by 6 of 7 AI engines — the #2 cited source, behind only google.com, for “how to run crypto Google Ads without getting disapproved.”
- Ranks a cluster of crypto-ads terms at positions 2–10 in the US (Ahrefs), several surfaced in Google’s AI Overview.
Figures from public AI-engine citation scans (via the tracker I built) and Ahrefs — not client analytics.
How to start
Start with the diagnostic. Scale when the numbers say to.
Two one-off purchases and one ongoing engagement. Start with the Report — you never commit to a retainer before you've seen the opportunity in your own numbers.
This is for you if
- Your buyers research before they buy — a considered, higher-value purchase.
- You have a real site with something true and specific to say.
- You want proof from a tracker, not a monthly vibe check.
This isn't for you if
- You need leads this week — GEO compounds over months, not days.
- You sell pure impulse buys nobody researches first.
- You can't ship changes to your pages, or won't.
AI + SEO Visibility Report
One-offOne-off
The full AI + SEO baseline: prompts, engines, competitors, and the pages worth building.
A one-off diagnostic that maps the buying-intent prompts in your market, who gets cited today, and the specific pages to build.
30-Day AI Visibility Sprint
One-offOne-off · scoped to project size
Thirty days of building: fixes shipped, priority pages rebuilt to be cited.
Technical fixes, your priority pages rebuilt to be citable, and the citation and source work that gets an engine to quote you. Scope and price depend on your site's size — we set both on the call. The Sprint counts as month one if you continue on a retainer within 30 days.
Ongoing GEO + SEO Growth
Retainer90-day initial commitment
The compounding version: new pages, new prompts, tracked every month.
Continuous GEO and SEO work — new citable pages, more buying-intent prompts taken one by one, and the monthly tracker report. Then month to month.
Priority Growth
Retainer90-day initial commitment
Everything in Growth, at a faster cadence — weekly builds, more pages taken each month.
For teams treating AI search as a primary channel: weekly cadence, more priority pages rebuilt per month, and multi-market tracking. One brand, maximum push.
Scale Retainer
RetainerMulti-brand / enterprise · scoped on a call
Multi-brand or enterprise — weekly cadence, multi-market, priority build capacity.
For agencies, portfolios, or companies past $20M revenue running several brands. Weekly cadence, multi-market tracking, and priority build capacity across brands — scoped on a call.
The Report fee is credited toward a Sprint or retainer if you continue within 14 days.
The $1,250 Report is a fixed price, payable by card — buy it above and you'll go straight to secure checkout. The Sprint and retainer are scoped to your project on the call. Focused on one surface? See the generative engine optimization and answer engine optimization services. Need custom AI systems built rather than visibility work? See AI automation & agent development.
Add-ons — extend any Sprint or retainer
Fixed prices where you can buy now; everything else is scoped and added on a call — the base engagement never gets repriced mid-project.
A mention or citation on a source AI engines actually quote in your market — sourced, negotiated, verified live before it's billed. Priced by niche: competitive verticals (finance, crypto, legal) run higher.
Five additional pages written and structured to be quotable — entities, sources, schema — and interlinked with the pages you already rank with.
Tracker coverage plus a localized content cadence in any of the 29 markets the platform measures.
We run the campaigns under your brand — delivery, dashboards and reports included. Our platform and process, your client relationship.
The exact pipeline behind our own blog — ~108,300 AI-citation appearances in a trailing 30-day Bing sample. One revenue keyword per article: AI research depth (multi-engine fact panel, SERP and competitor analysis), human editorial gates on every claim. 48-hour minimum turnaround — the QA is not skippable — then tracked for 90 days.
Buy — $450A full topic cluster plus hub — the exact playbook behind our own blog — interlinked, fact-checked, and tracked from day one.
Buy — $3,500Running multiple brands, or revenue past $20M? The Scale retainer (from $10,000/mo) adds weekly cadence, multi-market tracking and priority build capacity — scoped on a call.
One exclusion on the content offers: we don't take GEO, SEO or AI-visibility topics. We won't write for competitors — that beat is ours.
On-time delivery guarantee
If we miss a milestone after you've given on-time access and feedback, we refund that milestone's fee. We never guarantee rankings or citations — no honest person can — only that we deliver on time or pay for missing.
You own everything
Every page, dashboard and dataset is yours. If we stop working together, you keep the work, the tracker baseline, and the pages — nothing is held hostage.
Start with the Report
If the opportunity doesn't justify implementation, you keep the research and owe no retainer. The Report has to earn the Sprint before the Sprint earns the retainer.
FAQ
The six questions we always get
- 01How is this different from regular SEO?Regular SEO earns a ranking a human might click. This earns a citation inside the answer the human actually reads — in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot and AI Overviews. The overlap: good GEO work also lifts classic rankings (our test domain put 20,541 keywords into Google while chasing citations). The difference: a normal SEO can't hand you an AI-citation report. I built the platform that produces one.
- 02How long until results?Our own zero-authority domain took about 7 weeks to first meaningful citations. Your site has age and authority ours didn't; your market has competition ours didn't — plan on first tracked movement in 4–8 weeks, compounding after. What you get in week one: the baseline. If someone promises AI citations in days, ask to see their tracking.
- 03How do you measure it?With the cross-engine tracker I built (geotoolbox.ai). It queries the real engines with the real prompts your buyers use and logs who's cited, where, how often. Your monthly report is its raw output — prompts, engines, citations, deltas. A log, not an estimate.
- 04What if it doesn't work?The tracker will say so, the same month we see it — that's the deal with reporting from a measurement tool instead of a slide deck. No long-term lock-in; the baseline is yours to keep. We can't guarantee an LLM's output — anyone who does is lying — but you'll always know exactly what you got for the money.
- 05Why you and not a big agency?I built GEO Toolbox — the platform the industry uses to measure AI visibility — and I lead the work on your account, with a small senior team on delivery. Not a strategist on a sales call handing off to a junior, not three departments: the founder who built the measurement tool, in the code of your pages. What you get: founder-level execution in the one channel where your problem lives.
- 06Is my industry too niche?Niche is the best case. Fewer sources means the engines have fewer candidates to cite; one well-built, verifiable page can own an answer for months. The real qualifier isn't your industry — it's whether your buyers research before they buy.
The answers are being written right now.
With you or without you.
Book a call. I'll read your AI visibility with you and tell you straight whether this is worth doing — founder to founder, no handoff.